Legal Opinion

Hamburg Sudamerikanische Dampfschiffahrts-Gesellschaft KG v. Texport, Inc.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided June 20, 2013No. Civil Action No. 7:12-cv-00083-MGLPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MARY G. LEWIS, District Judge.

This civil action involves the shipment of goods identified as “textile rags and remnants” from the United States to Brazil in 2011 by Defendant Texport, Inc. (“Tex-port”) and/or its agents, servants, subcontractors and/or employees. (ECF No. 1.) Pending before this court are Third-Party Defendant Textile Buff & Wheel Company a/k/a Textile Waste Supply Company, LLC’s (“Textile Waste”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 82) pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Fourth-Party Defendant Peerless Materials Company’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hutton v. Hydra-Tech, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
  2. Rice v. M-E-C CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  3. SUTTON v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022
  4. Vitale v. MiMedx Group IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API