Legal Opinion
King v. American Family Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 31, 2011No. 08-35988PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
Imagine this scenario:
An out-of-state insurance company is contemplating doing business in Montana. Preliminary to any authorization to sell policies or the transaction of any business, state law requires the company to appoint the Commissioner of Insurance for service of process, which it did. Although the company began the licensure application process, the company cannot yet sell policies in Montana and has not completed the regulatory process to do so. The company has no contacts or contracts, no sales agents or producers, no employees, and no offices in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme Et L'antisemitismeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- CollegeSource, Inc. v. AcademyOne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Anthony Fidrych v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Lorenzo Mendoza Martinez v. Avions De Transport RegionalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Genuine Parts Co. v. CepecSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.