Legal Opinion

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Allegri

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1926No. 6 Div. 636PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The trial judge instructed the jury that:. “The measure of plaintiff’s damage [if entitled] would be the difference between the reasonable market value of the cucumbers as they actually arrived in Salt Lake City and the reasonable market value of the cucumbers, had there been no fault on the part of the railroad company; in other words, the reasonable market value of the cucumbers had they been in the condition they would have been in, had there been no fault on the part of the railroad company.”

The evidence showed that the freight charges had not been paid on the shipment in question, except…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buist v. GuiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Capehart v. MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. Echols v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Hodge v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Southern Ry. Co. v. CooperAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co. v. SciandraSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. H. Daroff & Sons, Inc. v. Strickland Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API