Legal Opinion

Echols v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the City Court of Decatur. Tried before the Hon. Morris A. Tyn&, as special judge. cited Lakeman v. Grinnell, 2 Bosw. (N. Y.) 626; Field on Bamages, § 376.

1Opinion of the CourtMcOLELLAN, J.

The trial below was had before a special judge, without jury, ,and this appeal brings under review his findings of fact, and the judgment rendered thereon. — Acts 1888-9, p. 321. The action was against a common carrier, for an alleged failure to deliver to consignees, in Memphis, Tennessee, a certain bale of cotton delivered to it for carriage at Hartselle, Alabama. The evidence showed that the cotton was the property of the plaintiff, and that, though received by the railway company for carriage to Memphis, it was never in fact shipped, but was lost from defendant’s shipping platform at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ward v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  2. Foster v. RodgersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  3. Rome Railroad v. SloanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  4. South & North Ala. R. R. v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GilmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Buist v. GuiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Zimmern v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Ross v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Marshall Medicine Co. v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Western Railway v. PriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API