Legal Opinion
H. Daroff & Sons, Inc. v. Strickland Transportation Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 10, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 43082PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MASTERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff has brought this civil action against the defendant-carrier, Strickland Transportation Inc., claiming damages arising from Strickland’s loss of four shipments of men’s clothing, made by plaintiff between August 29, 1966, and October 3, 1966. Federal jurisdiction of this action is based upon the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act, Title 49 U.S.C.A. § 20(11), and upon Title 28 U.S. C.A. § 1337.
Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on the basis that there “ * * * is no genuine issue…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. McCaull CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Stuart Inv. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1951
- Gore Products v. Texas N. O. R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
- United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1953
- 608 Hamilton Street Corp. v. Columbia Pictures Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- F. J. McCarty Co., Inc. v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Chuy v. Philadelphia EaglesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Philips Consumer Electronics Co. v. Arrow Carrier Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Flood v. KuhnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970