Legal Opinion

Bergman v. United States

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided February 7, 1984No. G 77-6PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON DAMAGES

ENSLEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) are Dr. Walter Bergman and the personal representative of the estate of his late wife, Frances Bergman. Both Walter and Frances Bergman were among the “freedom riders” who traveled by bus into the South in May, 1961 to test a recent pronouncement by the United States Supreme Court that the Constitution required racial equality in interstate transportation facilities. Their encounter with a conspiracy of violent racism in Alabama was described in detail by this Court in an earlier…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Edward Nekolny, Patrick Dumas, and Maria L. Dahms v. Ann B. Painter, Individually and as Supervisor of Lyons Township, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  4. Bennie Lenard, Cross-Appellant v. Robert Argento & Joseph Sansone v. Village of Melrose ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Norman Birnbaum, B. Leonard Avery and Mary Rule MacMillen Plaintiffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Park v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Ruffalo v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
  3. Bergman v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1986
  4. Bergman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. Bergman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API