Legal Opinion

Park v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 28, 1997No. 96-8512PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Per curiam

This ease presents the issue of whether a defendant must be a participant in a § 1985(3) conspiracy for liability to attach under 42 U.S.C. § 1986. We hold that such participation is not required and remand for further proceedings.

I.PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Appellants brought suit against the City of Atlanta, the Mayor, and the Chief of Police, claiming violations of four provisions of the civil rights statutes, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985(3), and 1986, as well as the Georgia Constitution, state tort law, and various city ordinances. As the predicate for their federal civil rights claims,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 610 v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health ClinicSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. GuestSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. United States v. KozminskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Jimenez v. Wellstar Health SystemCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Farese v. SchererCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Godby v. Montgomery County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
  5. William A. White v. William Berger, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API