Legal Opinion
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 20, 1996No. C6-94-76Published
1Opinion of the Court
550 N.W.2d 275 (1996)
Marlene MEATH, Respondent,
v.
HARMFUL SUBSTANCE COMPENSATION BOARD, petitioner, Appellant.
No. C6-94-76.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
June 20, 1996.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Attorney General, Jocelyn F. Olson, Asst. Attorney General, St. Paul, for Appellant.
Neal J. Robinson, Duane E. Arndt, Arndt & Benton, P.A., Minneapolis, for Respondent.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
COYNE, Justice.
The Harmful Substance Compensation Board denied respondent Marlene Meath's claim for compensation from the harmful substance compensation account established pursuant to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.