Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Murray

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1996No. 2:96-cv-02070PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RENDELL, District Judge.

Before me is the appeal of debtor Edmond C. Murray (“Debtor”) from the Order of the bankruptcy court that a document entitled “Motor Vehicle Lease and Disclosure Statement” was in fact a “true lease,” rather than an installment purchase agreement with a security interest. As there are no factual issues, I review the bankruptcy court’s legal conclusions under a de novo standard. In re Baltic Associates, L.P., 170 B.R. 568, 570 (E.D.Pa.1994).

The bankruptcy judge ably and effectively applied the proper tests for determining whether or not the auto lease in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Wheatland Electric Products Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. In Re ZalehaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 1993
  3. In Re Aspen Impressions, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. In Re WallaceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  5. In Re Baltic Associates, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re KimUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. In Re Uni Imaging Holdings, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2010
  3. Moore v. Emery (In Re American Steel Product, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 1996
  4. In Re PellegrinoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API