Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Beloit Corp.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided November 29, 1989No. Civ. 87-1051PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
OREN HARRIS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action seeking damages for a leg injury sustained by Mr. Wilson while working for defendant International Paper Company (IPC). Wilson was awarded workers’ compensation benefits, and then brought this action against Beloit Corporation, the manufacturer of the machine which allegedly caused the injury. When Wilson sought to obtain certain component parts of the machine, it was discovered that the parts were missing. Wilson then brought IPC into this action on the theory that IPC either intentionally destroyed or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Koplin v. Rosel Well Perforators, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- Coley v. Arnot Ogden Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Parker v. Thyssen Min. Const., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Rice v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Samuel Carlton Wilson and Flora Idell Wilson, His Wife v. Beloit Corporation John Doe 1-10Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Samuel Carlton Wilson and Flora Idell Wilson, His Wife v. Beloit Corporation John Doe 1-10 International Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Hogan v. Raymond Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990