Legal Opinion

Hoffheimer v. Stiefel

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action on foreign judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

' McAdam, J.

The action is upon a judgment recovered against the defendants April 20, 1883, in a court of general jurisdiction in Missouri, in which state the defendants resided at the time. The complaint alleges the recovery of the judgment, and in referring to the record thereof alleges that the defendants were served with process and appeared in the action and interposed an answer therein. The defense is substantially a general denial.

Upon the trial the plaintiffs offered in evidence an exemplified copy of the record duly authenticated, together with transfers of the same to them, and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Ferguson v. . CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Starbuck v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Crane v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Shumway v. StillmanNew York Supreme Court · 1831

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gustavus v. DahlmerNew York Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Humnicki v. PitkowaNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Gray v. Richmond Bicycle Co.New York Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API