Legal Opinion
Humnicki v. Pitkowa
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.
The complaint contains the following allegations:
“ First. That prior to the 4th day of November, 1921, the plaintiff duly commenced an action against the defendants in the Supreme *408Court, County of Oneida, State of New York; that the summons in said action was served upon the defendants personally and no appearance was made therein by either of the herein-named defendants.
“ Second. That thereafter and on or about the 4th day of November, 1921, plaintiff recovered a judgment by default in said action against both of the defendants herein, which said judgment in the amount of $499.40 was duly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ferguson v. . CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Noyes v. ButlerNew York Supreme Court · 1849
- Pullen v. Seaboard Trading Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Rice v. CoutantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Hoffheimer v. StiefelNew York Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- O'Sullivan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975