Legal Opinion

Humnicki v. Pitkowa

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

The complaint contains the following allegations:

“ First. That prior to the 4th day of November, 1921, the plaintiff duly commenced an action against the defendants in the Supreme *408Court, County of Oneida, State of New York; that the summons in said action was served upon the defendants personally and no appearance was made therein by either of the herein-named defendants.
“ Second. That thereafter and on or about the 4th day of November, 1921, plaintiff recovered a judgment by default in said action against both of the defendants herein, which said judgment in the amount of $499.40 was duly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. . CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Noyes v. ButlerNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Pullen v. Seaboard Trading Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. Rice v. CoutantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Hoffheimer v. StiefelNew York Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Sullivan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API