Legal Opinion

People v. Rice

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 1999No. Docket 200228PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND

Before: Markey, P.J., and Griffin and Whitbeck, JJ. Griffin, J.

In our prior decision, People v Rice, 231 Mich App 126; 585 NW2d 331 (1998), rev’d 459 Mich 896 (1998), remanded 459 Mich 924 (1998), we reluctantly reversed and remanded for a new trial only because we were compelled do so pursuant to the precedent of People v Anderson, 398 Mich 361; 247 NW2d 857 (1976). Were we permitted, we would have followed the rule of the majority of other jurisdictions in holding “that a defendant’s request to represent himself must be made in a timely manner or else the defendant relinquishes the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. People v. MilbournMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Anderson v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. People v. PickensMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. People v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. HornMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. People v. DixonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. People v. SolmonsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API