Forster v. Gianopoulos
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HARPER, J.
The defendants, Gus Gianopoulos and Tom Gianopoulos, appeal from the default judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Philip Forster. The judgment followed an order that the defendants disclose certain documents to the plaintiff, with which the court determined the defendants had not complied. The defendants now claim that the court lacked authority to render a default judgment and, alternatively, that the court abused its discretion in rendering a default judgment. We disagree.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our disposition…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Advanced Financial Services, Inc. v. Associated Appraisal Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Olin Corp. v. CastellsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Costello v. Hartford Institute of Accounting, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Stevenson Lumber Company-Suffield, Inc. v. Chase Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Picard v. Guilford House, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Giblen v. GhogawalaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Gutierrez v, MosorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021