Olin Corp. v. Castells
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
The plaintiff Olin Corporation instituted an action against the defendant Raul Castells wherein it alleged that the defendant had fraudulently induced Olin to pay $70,000 into a Swiss hank account which sum the defendant converted to his own use in breach of his employment agreement with Olin. Pursuant to § 52-278e of the General Statutes,1 Olin applied for a prejudgment remedy alleging that there was a reasonable likelihood that the defendant had fraudulently disposed of his property with the intent to defraud his creditor. On the basis of affidavits containing hearsay statements and a copy…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Murphy v. DantowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
3Cited by30 opinions
- Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- In re Samantha C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Desrosiers v. HenneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Whitaker v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- City of Bridgeport v. Kasper Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.