Columbus Safe-Deposit Co. v. Burke
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United states for the .Northern Division of the Northern District of Illinois.
1Opinion of the Court
WOODS, Circuit Judge.
This was an action of assumpsit, the declaration containing only the common counts. The answer was: First, non assumpsit; second, that the several supposed causes of action mentioned were one, to wit, a supposed cause of action on certain contracts in writing, copies of which are made "exhibits” (a questionable mode of pleading), and the substance thereof alleged, whereby the defendant in error, the plaintiff below, undertook, on terms and conditions stated, to furnish the materials, prepare, put in plací!, and finish the marble and mosaic work in the building then in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Springer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Runkle v. BurnhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Camden v. DoremusSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gibson v. LutherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Horton v. EmersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- American Car & Foundry Co. v. BrinkmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1906
- Patting v. Spring Valley Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- Albany Perforated Wrapping-Paper Co. v. John Hoberg Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901