Legal Opinion

American Car & Foundry Co. v. Brinkman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 18, 1906No. 1,195PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois.

1Opinion of the Court

SEAMAN, Circuit Judge.

The American Car & Foundry Company, plaintiff in error, was the defendant below in an action of trespass on the case for injuries suffered by the defendant in error while in its service, through alleged negligence on the part of the plaintiff in error. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment against the American Car & Foundry Company, and various errors are assigned for reversal.

The undisputed facts, in substance, are these: The corporation plaintiff in error is engaged in a large manufacturing industry at Madison, Ill., with a plant of several buildings, one…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Turner v. . City of NewburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. New England Railroad v. ConroySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Prettyman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  3. Philyaw v. Arundel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API