Legal Opinion
Maxum Indemnity Company v. Gribbins
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided March 23, 2020No. 3:13-cv-00804Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION MAXUM INDEMNITY COMPANY Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-00804-RGJ-RSE BROKEN SPOKE BAR & GRILL, LLC, ET Defendants AL. * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Maxum Indemnity Company’s (“Maxum’s”) Supplemental Briefing in Support of Summary Judgment. [DE 84]. Briefing is complete. [DE 85, DE 86, DE 87]. For the reasons below, the Court will GRANT Maxum’s Motion for Summary Judgment. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The relevant facts are set forth in the Court’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gene Autrey Adams v. Paul MetivaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Williams v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.