Legal Opinion

Sutherland v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Johnson Circuit Court. — Hon. Noah M. Givan. Juclge.

1Opinion of the Court

Philips, C.

This is a proceeding instituted by tlie respondents, D. L. Sutherland and others in the county court of Johnson county, for opening a new road in said county. *400The appellant, Rufus E. Holmes, through whose land the proposed road would run, filed objections claiming damages, as by statute in such cases provided. lie had a hearing in the county court on the issues thus made. From the judgment of the county court he appealed to the circuit- court, where his damages were re-assessed, and the order of the county court directing the road to be opened was affirmed. From this judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norfleet v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Long v. WagonerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Howe v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Tarkio v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  2. Seafield v. BohneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Kansas City v. VineyardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Cox v. DakeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. In re the Establishment of Forsyth BoulevardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API