Legal Opinion

Long v. Wagoner

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1870PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Second District Court. cited Davis v. Davis, 8 Mo. 56; 5 Am. Law Reg., N. S., 142 ; 1 Stark. Ev., § 652 ; Boardman v. Reed’s Lessee, 6 Pet. 845 ; Dell v. Dawson, 32 Mo. 87; Hardy v. Mathews, 38 Mo. 121 ; Campbell v. Johnson, 44 Mo. 250; Clemens v- Rannells et al., 34 Mo. 579; Speck v. Wohlien, 22 Mo. 315; Moreau v. Detchemendy, 18 Mo. 522. The omission of not stating the county in the deed was not such an ambiguity as would defeat the title.

Read the full summary

Error to Second District Court. cited Davis v. Davis, 8 Mo. 56; 5 Am. Law Reg., N. S., 142 ; 1 Stark. Ev., § 652 ; Boardman v. Reed’s Lessee, 6 Pet. 845 ; Dell v. Dawson, 32 Mo. 87; Hardy v. Mathews, 38 Mo. 121 ; Campbell v. Johnson, 44 Mo. 250; Clemens v- Rannells et al., 34 Mo. 579; Speck v. Wohlien, 22 Mo. 315; Moreau v. Detchemendy, 18 Mo. 522. The omission of not stating the county in the deed was not such an ambiguity as would defeat the title. (Hart v. Rector et al., 13 Mo. 497 ; Evans v. Green, 21 Mo. 170 ; 44 Mo. 185; 43 Mo. 13 ; 1 Greenl. Ev. 6.)

1Opinion of the CourtCurrier, Judge

Trespass guare clausum. Thomas R. Livingston, in his lifetime, acquired under a patent from the United States the title to forty acres of land situated in Washington county, Missouri, which were described in the patent as follows : “ The southeast fourth of the northeast fourth of section 24, township 39, range 1 east, in the district of lands subject to sale at St. Louis, Missouri.” Livingston subsequently died, and his administratrix, under aq order of the County Court of said Washington county, sold and conveyed to the plaintiff forty acres of land by the following description, viz: “ The…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Black v. Pratt Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Springer v. KleinsorgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. Leigh v. GreenNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Kansas City v. VineyardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. Smith v. BlackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API