Legal Opinion

State v. Cox

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1927No. 26,245PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Appeal from the judgment of conviction and from an order denying a new trial. Defendant was convicted of the crime of rape.

Sexual intercourse is admitted. The controversy relates to defendant’s claim that the girl consented. There is a sharp conflict between the two. The jury was privileged to find either way. .There seems to be weakness in the version of both parties. The very common argument, in cases of this character, is made to the effect that some of the acts as detailed by the girl are improbable and that at the preliminary examination she did not give the identical version as on the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. State v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Donnelly v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. Simmons v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Noonan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. State v. RingWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Beckman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API