Legal Opinion

Conway v. Cumming

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 9, 1993No. 92-286PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Plaintiff was convicted of sexual assault, sentenced to a term of five to twenty years, and is now an inmate committed to the custody of the Commissioner of Corrections. He appeals from a judgment of the Chittenden Superior Court denying injunctive relief to direct the Commissioner to restore plaintiff’s furlough status. We affirm.

As an inmate, plaintiff participated in the Vermont Treatment Program for Sexual Aggressors (VTPSA) as part of a rehabilitation effort. In October 1989, the Commissioner began granting plaintiff furloughs to be in the community for short visits. See 28 V.S.A. §…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kevin Holcomb v. Mark Lykens, Sean Smith, Joanne Pereria and John GorczykCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. State v. LeClaireSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  3. Parker v. GorczykSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  4. State v. Bogert, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. Zachary Rose v. Michael Touchette, Commissioner, Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API