Legal Opinion
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. National Indian Gaming Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 12, 2006No. Civil Action 05-00806 (RMC)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLYER, District Judge.
After the Court denied the initial motion for summary judgment filed by the National Indian Gaming Commission (“NIGC”) in this FOIA 1 case, the Commission submitted additional declarations describing its search for responsive documents and moved again for summary judgment. Requester and Plaintiff Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”) continues to object. NIGC has now thoroughly described its search and defended its reliance on various FOIA exemptions. Nothing more is required. The motion for summary judgment will be granted.
I.…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bigwood v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Landmark Legal Foundation v. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Coffey v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- ['Scudder v. Central Intelligence Agency']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Leopold v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.