Legal Opinion
230 Park Avenue Associates v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided June 21, 1995No. Claim No. 84601PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerard M. Weisberg, J.
This is claimant’s motion to dismiss the State’s fourth affirmative defense; or in the alternative, for permission to file a late claim pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6), to deem *922the filed claim to have been filed nunc pro tune within the statutory period, or to estop the State from asserting such defense. It is also defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim upon its fourth and eighth affirmative defenses. In reply, claimant seeks to strike the eighth affirmative defense, or to estop the State from asserting it, and for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bradkin v. LevertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Parsa v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Kennedy v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Jaroslow v. Lehigh Valley RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sarbro IX v. State New York Office of General ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Professional Charter Services, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1995
- Lachtman v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007