Legal Opinion
Jaroslow v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 20, 1969PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mbmobaitdum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Section 232-c of the Beal Property Law changes the common-law rule relating to creation of a holdover tenancy. *993It provides that the mere holding over by a tenant whose term is longer than one month does not allow the landlord to create a holdover tenancy without his acceptance of rent from the holding over tenant. The language in the statute “ unless an agreement either express or implied is made providing otherwise ” refers only to extension of the duration of the holdover tenancy beyond a tenancy from month to month. In…
2Cited by38 opinions
- Simpson v. SaroffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Stahl Associates Co. v. MapesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Stainless Broadcasting Co. v. Clear Channel Broadcasting Licenses, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Hanover Direct, Inc. v. T.R. Acquisition Corp. (In Re T.R. Acquisition Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- 615 Nostrand Avenue Corp. v. RoachAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.