Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Council of Unit Owners of Gables on Tuckerman Condominium

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 15, 2008No. 99, September Term, 2007PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

In the present case, we are presented with the question of whether a condominium council of owners under the Maryland Condominium Act, Section 11-101, et seq., of the Real Property Article, Maryland Code (1974, 2003 Repl.Vol.) (“the Act”), is required to repair or replace property of an owner in an individual condominium unit after a casualty loss. We shall answer in the negative.

I. Introduction

This appeal consists of two separate underlying cases that were consolidated by the Court of Special Appeals, which we have followed. Although the facts of the underlying cases are different, they…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Mayor of Baltimore v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Lovelace v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Mayor of Oakland v. Mayor of Mountain Lake ParkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Gourdine v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Blondell v. LittlepageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Koste v. Town of OxfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. D'AOUST v. DiamondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API