Legal Opinion

McFarlin v. Hewitt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1958PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

In cases where a new trial has been granted in the interests of justice under sec. 270.49 (2), Stats., this court does not look for evidence to sustain the jury findings, but it seeks to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in ordering a new trial. It seeks reasons to sustain the finding of the trial judge. In jury cases where the jury verdict has had the approval of the trial judge this court will uphold the verdict if sustained by any credible evidence. In this case the question is whether the trial court abused its discretion in ordering a new trial in the interests of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guptill v. RoemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bolssen v. HeenanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Wodill v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Bohlman v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Edwards v. Alhambra Theatre Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hillstead v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Quick v. American Legion 1960 Convention Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Van Gheem v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API