Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Hill

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1968No. 39701PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

Each of the defendants, John A. McDermott, Reverend John Hill, Reverend Thomas Heaney and Reverend Richard Heidkamp, was charged with violating ordinances of the city of Chicago prohibiting the obstruction of traffic (Municipal Code, sec. 27 — 291) and disorderly conduct (Municipal Code, sec. 193 — 1). The cases were consolidated for trial. Each defendant was found guilty and each was find $100 for obstructing traffic and $25 for disorderly conduct.

On this direct appeal, the defendants attack the constitutionality of both ordinances on the ground that they violate section 13 of article IV of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Raley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. The People v. SchlengerIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. The People v. DuszkewyczIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Chicago Cosmetic Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  5. City of Metropolis v. GibbonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. The PEOPLE v. RabyIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. The People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. LeeIllinois Supreme Court · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API