Legal Opinion

Chicago Cosmetic Co. v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1940No. 25694. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farthing

This suit was brought to restrain the defendants from enforcing the chemical or paint factories ordinance of the city of Chicago, the sections of. which, as amended, are as follows:

“Article II.
“Chemical or Paint Factories.
“3828. Chemical os Paint Factory Defined.) The term ‘chemical or paint factory’ as used in this article shall be construed to mean any factory, building, place or establishment where soda, soda ash, salt, sal soda bicarbonate of soda, caustic soda, alcohol ether, essential oils, carbonic acid gas, chlorine, aniline, benzine, perfumes, toilet preparations, coal-tar chemicals,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Spiegler v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. City of Chicago v. Union Ice Cream Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
  3. City of Chicago v. Arbuckle Bros.Illinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. City of Metropolis v. GibbonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Klever Shampay Karpet Kleaners, Inc. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Corens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Du Bois v. GibbonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Father Basil's Lodge, Inc. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Schuringa v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Ver Steegh v. FlaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API