Legal Opinion
Schoene v. Hicks
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 24, 1933No. 21390PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OSBORN. J.
This is an action brought in the district court of Latimer county, wherein the plaintiff, E. G. Schoene, seeks to recover damages against the defendants, S. T. Hicks, H. E. Bagby and the Bengal Lumber Company, a corporation, for a trespass upon the lands of plaintiff and the removal of timber of tbe alleged value of $1,817.62. By virtue of the provisions of section 6007, C. O. S. 1921 (O. S. 1931, sec. 9994), the plaintiff claims the right to recover three times the value of the timber actually taken, and asks for judgment in the sum of $5,452.86.
At the trial of this cause a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Neilson & Kittle Canning Co. v. F. G. Lowe & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Empire Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cortright v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Manuel v. Oklahoma City UniversityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
- Dick v. VogtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Queen Anne Candy Co. v. EagleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939