Legal Opinion

Cabasquini v. Commissioner of Social Services

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 25, 1995No. 13730PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court affirming the defendant’s disbursement of a portion of the plaintiff’s retroactive social security income benefits to the city of New Haven. On appeal, the plaintiff asserts that the disbursement was improper because (1) the plaintiff’s written authoriza*524tion for such disbursement, required by statute,1 had expired, and (2) the retroactive benefits were not disbursed within ten working days after the defendant received the benefit checks as required by statute.2 We disagree with both of the plaintiffs assertions and affirm the judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Lieberman v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Woodbury Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  5. Baerst v. State Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Menillo v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Masko v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. Ahern v. Thomas, No. Cv960556531 (Oct. 10, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
  4. Airtouch Paging v. Dpuc, No. Cv96-0563730 (Mar. 27, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
  5. Anderson v. Thomas, No. Cv 98 0492695s (Aug. 9, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API