Legal Opinion
Roddis v. All-Coverage Insurance Exchange Automobile & Fire
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1967No. Civ. 29419PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHufstedler, J.
Strong appeals from an order denying his application for attorney’s fees for his representing All-Coverage Insurance Exchange Automobile and Fire (“Exchange”) and its attorney-in-fact, All-Coverage Underwriters, Ine. (“Underwriters”), in their efforts to terminate the Insurance Commissioner’s conservatorship of both organizations, contending that the trial court did not give him a “full hearing” on his applications for fees and that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to award him reasonable fees from the insolvents ’ assets in the conservator’s hands.
The principles of law…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Paradise v. NowlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Anderson v. Great Republic Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Himmel v. City Council of BurlingameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Pratt v. Robert S. Odell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- McConnell v. ALL-COVERAGE INS. EXCH. AUTOMOBILE AND FIRECalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Pfeifer v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People Ex Rel. Schacht v. MAIN INSUR. CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- American Center for Education, Inc. v. CavnarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- In Re Ambassador Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.