Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Haffner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

— Suit by Haffner against Peterson, for damages occasioned by an assault and battery.

Answer: the general denial, and a special paragraph. A demurrer was sustained to the latter; but, as the facts stated in it were'admissible under the general denial, the action of the court upon the demurrer is unimportant.

Trial; verdict for the plaintiff, in the sum of one thou- • sand dollars, and judgment, over a motion for a new trial, on the verdict; exception. Errors are properly assigned.

The facts of the case are as follows:

*131■ On the 25th of April, 1874, Fred Haffner, a boy five years old, and his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bullock v. BabcockNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. Adams v. WaggonerIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Home Insurance Company v. NeilsenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. HawkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Mercer v. CorbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Bottorff v. South Construction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Keel v. HainlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API