Legal Opinion

State v. Hanger

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1920No. 22,886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Douglas district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for unlawfully having intoxicating liquor in his possession in violation of section 1 of chapter 215 of the Laws of 1917, the “bone-dry law.”

1. The first contention of the defendant is that the evidence was not sufficient to prove that he had intoxicating liquor in his possession. The evidence on that question may be summarized as follows. The sheriff testified that he found four quarts of whisky under the cushion in the back seat of the *116defendant’s automobile at his father’s home; and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  2. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  3. State ex rel. Little v. SpencerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  4. State v. FolwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  5. State v. WheelerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. State v. KetterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. Fowler v. ShawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Chapman v. BoyntonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1933
  5. Hanger v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API