Legal Opinion

Swanson v. State Farm General Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 2013No. B240016PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SEGAL, J. * —

INTRODUCTION

An insurer agrees to provide a defense with a reservation of rights and approves independent counsel selected by the insured to represent the insured in an underlying tort action, pursuant to Civil Code section 2860 and San Diego Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Ins. Society, Inc. (1984) 162 Cal.App.3d 358 [208 Cal.Rptr. 494] (Cumis). The insurer subsequently withdraws all reservations of rights and coverage defenses that give rise to the insured’s right to Cumis counsel. Must the insurer continue to pay the insured’s Cumis counsel after the insurer’s withdrawal…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
  5. San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Employers Assurance Company v. The Ford Store Morgan Hill Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
  2. Simonyan v. Nationwide Ins. Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  3. Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. NewlinDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API