Legal Opinion

Skousen v. Nidy

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1961No. 6950PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Vice Chief Justice.

This was an action to recover damages, for personal injuries received by Mariam Nidy (hereinafter called “plaintiff”) as a result of alleged indecent assaults inflicted upon her by D. P. Slcousen (hereinafter-called “defendant”). A trial before a jury resulted in a verdict giving the plaintiff judgment for compensatory and punitive-damages. The motions for judgment non obstante veredicto and new trial were denied and this appeal followed.

The facts in the light most favorable to • sustaining the judgment are: The plaintiff, a woman about sixty-five years of age,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Midkiff v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Jost v. RossArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Sibley v. JeffreysArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Mong Ming Club v. TangArizona Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Barnes v. OutlawArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Amerco v. ShoenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Braun v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. State v. MontanoArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Bennett v. City National Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API