Legal Opinion

Ensler v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 3, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.

This is a suit under the Employer’s Liability Act in which plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries caused, as it is alleged, by defendant’s negligence. At the time he received his injuries plaintiff Avas in the employ of defendant at Bismarck, Missouri, as a roundhouse foreman. His duties as such foreman were to inspect, and to repair or cause to be repaired, when in- need of repairs, the engines coming into such roundhouse, if such repairs could be made with the material, tools and appliances furnished by defendant for that purpose at Bismarck: as to cases in which required…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crim v. CrimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Cottrill v. KrumSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. Standard Manufacturing Co. v. SlotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State Ex Rel. Union Pac. Railroad Co. v. BlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Poe v. Illinois Cent. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Prince v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Conklin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Brennecke v. Ganahl Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Walters v. MaloneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API