Legal Opinion
United States v. David L. Nahodil
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 4, 1994No. 93-7519PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
David L. Nahodil, proceeding pro se, appeals from an order of the district court summarily denying his motion brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to set aside his conviction of using a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1), on the ground that his counsel was ineffective at a guilty plea hearing. The appeal turns on the distinction between the meaning of “prejudice to the government” in two contexts: (1) a § 2255 motion involving a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in the plea proceeding; and (2) a…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Michael Kapral v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. Joseph FiorelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- William Smith v. Secretary of New Mexico Department of Corrections Derald Kerby, Warden, Central New Mexico Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.