State v. Taylor

HILL, Judge.

Defendant initially contends that Judge Preston made insufficient findings of fact in his order denying defendant’s motion to *590suppress statements made by him to police officers. Defendant contends that, since his evidence on voir dire conflicted with evidence given by the police officers regarding whether he requested an attorney before making the statements and whether he stated that he did not wish to make a statement, the trial judge was required to make more specific findings of fact resolving the conflicts in testimony. The order entered by the trial judge states as follows:

1.…