Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Buckley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1882PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEA.L from the Circuit Court for Dane County. Action for the cancellation of a mortgage and to have the same declared to be fully satisfied. The facts are stated in the opinion. The plaintiff appealed from a judgment dismissing the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Oeton, J".

William Dunn, the husband of the plaintiff, was the owner of valuable omnibus property, and was en*191gaged in running omnibuses in the city of Madison, and had borrowed at different times a considerable sum of money of William Buckley, one of the defendants, to be used in his business, and on the 16th day of November, 1872, he gave Buckley a bill of sale on all said omnibus property to secure the same, and perhaps future advances, and such bill of sale was duly filed as a mortgage. In a short time Buckley became dissatisfied with such security, and exacted of Dunn as additional and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barber v. BabelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Boyd v. EllisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
  3. Spencer v. FredendallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Campbell v. BabcockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  5. White v. PolleysWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Bank of Hartland v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  2. Cumps v. KiyoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Holden v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. San Antonio Real Estate, Building & Loan Ass'n v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Roberts v. RobertsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API