Legal Opinion
Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Rick Mar Construction Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 14, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gilbert Ramirez, J.
Defendants Dockery move to vacate a default judgment in this foreclosure action on the grounds that they were never served with process.
background
This action (the mortgage action) was commenced in 1975 *317and a judgment entered in 1980. Thereafter, the property was sold by the plaintiff to HUD, which, in turn, deeded it to one Anne Frommann. Defendants’ motion to vacate was made after Frommann sought to evict them from the premises.
Plaintiff and Frommann (the opposition) oppose the relief sought on several grounds. Of primary interest are the following:
1.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McMullen v. ArnoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Amsterdam Savings Bank v. City View Management Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Empire National Bank v. Judal Construction of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Community State Bank v. HaakonsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Royal Zenith Corp. v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- European American Bank v. AbramoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994