Legal Opinion

Amsterdam Savings Bank v. City View Management Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1978PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order of the Appellate Division affirmed, without costs. Submission by respondents of material outside the record and discussion in respondents’ brief of such material have been disregarded. Because of the inclusion of the offending material costs are not awarded.

Intervenor-appellant was not, as respondent banks argue, just any member of the public, but a serious bidder who had made various commitments to effectuate its bid. In addition, as an alleged assignee it had an equitable ownership interest in the property resulting from a contract of sale made with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Flickinger v. . GlassNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Black v. BlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Vickery v. Village of SaugertiesNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. David Sweet v. Floyd Bennett, Superintendent of Elmira Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. Mauro Caballero v. John P. KeaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. Cappiello v. HokeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  5. Fulton v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API