Legal Opinion
Royal Zenith Corp. v. Continental Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 13, 1984PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Appellant, Royal Zenith Corporation, claiming that a printing press in transit to its customer had been damaged while in the custody of Container Service Company, a trucker, commenced an action for damages against Container, a foreign corporation. In accordance with Seider v Roth (17 NY2d 111), jurisdiction over Container was secured by attachment of a liability insurance policy issued to Container by respondent, Continental Insurance Company, a New York corporation. Respondent disclaimed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Seider v. RothNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Kamp v. . KampNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Gager v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Skyline Agency, Inc. v. Ambrose Coppotelli, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Bancplus Mortgage Corp. v. GallowayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- P.M.S., Inc. v. JakubowskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Lawati v. Montague Morgan Slade Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of B.Z. Chiropractic, P.C. v. Allstate Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.