Legal Opinion

United States v. Alfred Sforza and Josephine Sforza

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 10, 2003No. Docket 02-6017PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Circuit Judge.

The United States brought suit under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq., and federal common law, seeking recoupment of disability payments made to Alfred Sforza following a slip and fall. Alfred and Josephine Sforza appeal from a final judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Freeman, M.J.), enforcing a $200,000 settlement negotiated in open court. On appeal, the Sforzas (1) challenge subject matter jurisdiction on the ground that under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b), benefit determinations under the Federal…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Mathirampuzha v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. In Re WorldCom, Inc. Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  3. Mastroni-Mucker v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. In Re CMS Energy ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  5. Benicorp Insurance v. National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API