Omv Medical, Inc. v. United States, and Choctaw Management Services Enterprise, and Professional Performance Development Group, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
In this bid protest case, OMV Medical, Inc., protests the award of two contracts related to the Air Force’s Family Advocacy Program. The first contract, the FAP East contract, covers the eastern continental United States. The award of that contract was flawed, according to OMV, because the Air Force improperly released price information to one bidder without providing the same information to all bidders. The second contract, the FAP West contract, covers the western continental United States. The award of that contract was flawed, OMV argues, because the Air Force…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United States, and Westfalia Separators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Statistica, Inc. v. Warren G. Christopher, Secretary of State, and the Orkand Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Savin v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- DMS All-Star Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- PGBA, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Overstreet Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.