Legal Opinion

Mir v. L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided July 22, 2016No. 3:15-cv-2766-BPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*462MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DAVID L. HORAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Peter Mir (“Mir” or “Plaintiff’) has filed a Motion to Compel Defendant’s OFCCP Position Statement and Other Submissions [Dkt. No. 18] (the “MTC”), seeking an order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a) to require Defendant L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. (“Defendant” or “L-3”) to produce to Mir copies of L-3’s submissions to the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (“OFCCP”) during its investigation of L-3’s alleged discrimination against Mir.

United…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ackerman McQueen Inc v. StinchfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2020
  2. Dresser-Rand Co. v. Schutte & Koerting Acquisition Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
  3. Goulet v. The University of MississippiDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2023
  4. Grano v. Sodexo, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
  5. McKenzie Law Firm, P.A. v. Ruby Receptionists, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API