Mir v. L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*462MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DAVID L. HORAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff Peter Mir (“Mir” or “Plaintiff’) has filed a Motion to Compel Defendant’s OFCCP Position Statement and Other Submissions [Dkt. No. 18] (the “MTC”), seeking an order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a) to require Defendant L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. (“Defendant” or “L-3”) to produce to Mir copies of L-3’s submissions to the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (“OFCCP”) during its investigation of L-3’s alleged discrimination against Mir.
United…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ackerman McQueen Inc v. StinchfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2020
- Dresser-Rand Co. v. Schutte & Koerting Acquisition Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
- Goulet v. The University of MississippiDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2023
- Grano v. Sodexo, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
- McKenzie Law Firm, P.A. v. Ruby Receptionists, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.