Legal Opinion

Ackerman McQueen Inc v. Stinchfield

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided December 22, 2020No. 3:19-cv-03016Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ACKERMAN MCQUEEN, INC., ' ' Plaintiff, ' ' V. ' No. 3:19-cv-3016-X ' GRANT STINCHFIELD, ' ' Defendant. ' MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 Plaintiff Ackerman McQueen, Inc. (“Ackerman” or “AMc”) has filed a Motion to Compel, see Dkt. No. 21 (the “MTC”), in which it “asks the Court to compel Defendant, Grant Stinchfield, to answer an interrogatory and produce certain documents in response to AMc’s written discovery requests,” id. at 1. Ackerman, more specifically, requests that the Court “1. Overrule Stinchfield’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Heller v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. BradyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
  4. In Re Santa Fe International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  5. Fred W. Shields and Joyce Shields v. Sturm, Ruger & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API