Legal Opinion
Friese v. Simpson & Harper
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 13, 1915No. 5645PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Complaint; from city court of Sparta—Judge Moore. January 16, 1914.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
The present writ of error concerns the complaints of another defendant in a case heretofore before this court. *787See Cary v. Simpson, ante, 280 (82 S. E. 918). The suit proceeded against the Eriese Planing Mill Company under allegations that the Eriese Planing Mill Company was a partnership, composed of C. S. Cary and Mrs. Eriese.
1. Each of the alleged partners filed a plea of no-partnership; and inasmuch as in Gary's case, supra, we dealt with all of the cognate exceptions which were applicable solely to the partnership, the decision in the present case is controlled by the ruling in that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. Ross & BarfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Henderson v. Maysville Guano Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Cary v. Simpson & HarperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
3Cited by12 opinions
- Salters v. Pugmire Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Scott v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Clark v. Atlanta Veterans Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Moate v. HL Green CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. CumbieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.