Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Brannan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 1934No. 7917PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

Appellant, plaintiff below, sued appellees for damages for personal injuries resulting to him from assisting in starting a gas engine belonging to appellees. Trial wa's to a jury on special issues, only a part of which were answered, and judgment rendered for the defendants, from which Copeland has appealed.

While the pleadings of appellant, consisting of his original petition, a supplemental petition, and a trial amendment, are somewhat meager and general as to the grounds of recovery, we think they were sufficient as against a general demurrer. Appellant alleged, in substance,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parks v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Early-Foster Co. v. Tom B. Burnett & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. J. R. Milam Co. v. First Nat. Bank in Glen RoseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Coleman v. RolloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Cranston v. GautierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. HornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SuttonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Powers v. Standard Accident InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Southern Underwriters v. StubblefieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API