Legal Opinion

Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Sutton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1935No. 6333PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Judge RYAN

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

This is an original proceeding for mandamus to compel a district judge to render judgment for relator upon a jury’s verdict, certain special issues having been answered and others not answered. Thirty-five special issues were submitted to the jury, of which only fifteen were answered. Upon the return of said verdict, relator (defendant below) filed motion for judgment in its favor, which was denied by the trial court, and the case now stands on the docket of said court subject to call for trial.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CantyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. BankstonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Cortimeglia v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lewis v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'NTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. of Texas v. McKinneyTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Wagstaff v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Elliott v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API