Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Sutton
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Judge RYAN
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.
This is an original proceeding for mandamus to compel a district judge to render judgment for relator upon a jury’s verdict, certain special issues having been answered and others not answered. Thirty-five special issues were submitted to the jury, of which only fifteen were answered. Upon the return of said verdict, relator (defendant below) filed motion for judgment in its favor, which was denied by the trial court, and the case now stands on the docket of said court subject to call for trial.
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CantyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. BankstonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Cortimeglia v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lewis v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'NTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. of Texas v. McKinneyTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Wagstaff v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Elliott v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.